Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 posts - 16 through 28 (of 28 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Word association #18607
    rednck
    Participant

    charlie

    in reply to: Word association #18602
    rednck
    Participant

    sucks

    in reply to: Word association #18590
    rednck
    Participant

    dogs

    in reply to: FERNIE – DOG POOP CAPITAL OF THE KOOTENAYS #18335
    rednck
    Participant

    mikes – you summed up gagbandit’s reaction quite well, "edge".

    Lots of Calgarians are on edge these days from the stress of big-city-life and also defensive from criticism and not being liked by anyone outside of Calgary.

    We in BC expecially don’t like em due to having screwed up our communities by gobbling up our real estate with their dirty tar-sands money.

    Even Toronto folk are more appreciated these days!

    in reply to: Sustainable de-growth for Fernie? #14097
    rednck
    Participant

    mtnrat, you are not listening to earth1st or ryland or anyone…your self focused on something for you. What is it?

    What are you trying to sell?

    Are you a big risk taking developer? :lol:

    Your city comments are outrageous, "If we make a few changes in the way Fernie treats business we can regain our population of 5000 and have a more viable and vibrant community." Do you really believe this?

    Diminishing the arts and cultural community.

    The bitterness in your posts communicates a great deal…what happened to you?

    in reply to: Word association #18584
    rednck
    Participant

    sean

    in reply to: Word association #18582
    rednck
    Participant

    sick

    in reply to: Sustainable de-growth for Fernie? #14089
    rednck
    Participant

    Methane gas, minerals and coal will grow the Elk Valley economy for decades.

    You tourism flakes will be groveling for eternity! :P

    in reply to: Word association #18560
    rednck
    Participant

    stew

    in reply to: Washington Apples and Lake Koocanusa #18416
    rednck
    Participant

    Calling Koocanusa a "lake" is a stretch, it is a US Army Corps. of Engineers created "reservoir". Before the destruction it was a beautiful river valley as it continues to be below the dam and above the head waters.

    The reservoir best serves US interests as they control the water level.

    in reply to: Thunder Meadows Non Motorized Snowmobiling #18163
    rednck
    Participant

    The locked gate spring and fall with no snowmobiling/hunting/biking signs speak volumes.

    Be real.

    in reply to: Thunder Meadows Non Motorized Snowmobiling #18158
    rednck
    Participant

    Fernie riders have had much discussion on working on an alternate route into Easy Street so local riders are not totally dependent on Island Lake for access.

    The limited access is not in local riders best interest, rather a result of Island Lake policy towards riders and locals in general.

    The "holier than thou" attitude has gotta be shelved!

    in reply to: Thunder Meadows Non Motorized Snowmobiling #18162
    rednck
    Participant

    One might ask the question why the sledders are ignoring the recreational user plan and riding in non-motorized skier turf?

    An agreement between sledders and Island Lake Lodge that included staying out of Snow Much Fun’s (Powder Cowboy) terrain in exchange for grooming Mt McDermott road was put in place some years ago. The past and much respected manager of ILL brokered the deal in everyone‚Äôs interest.

    This year the present manager of ILL has abandoned the agreement.

    Unfortunately the sledders are severely compromising the Thunder Meadows cabin ski touring terrain located between ILL’s two snow cat operations.

    Hopefully past agreements will be respected and everyone returns to abiding by the recreational user plan and the usual state of bliss.

Viewing 13 posts - 16 through 28 (of 28 total)