Re: Wildsight not interested in what is fair…

[imported_ryland]

My name is Ryland Nelson and I work with Casey Brennan for Wildsight as well.

The work that I do for wildsight is meant to try to find a fair and balanced approach to development. One that finds a space for nature amongst our industrial uses of the region. See my responses to your post below:

world1st wrote :
> Wildsight proves once and for all that they are not interested in what is
> fair or balanced. Of course, we all knew they would continue to demand a
> national park. Here is what we can draw from their predictability:

Wildsight will continue to support moving forward with the feasibility study that is currently proposed by Parks Canada to complete Waterton National Park by adding the southeastern third of BC’s Flathead to the protected complex.
>
> • Wildsight does not believe in any form of economic development, however
> conservatively done. Tembec is a certified forest company that in the
> Flathead uses the most careful logging methods in North America.
> Nonetheless, if they had their way, all these family-supporting jobs would
> disappear.

Wildsight worked with Tembec to help them gain their Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Certification that opened up new markets for their paper products. This may be one of the reasons that they survived and other timber companies did not. If a national park were to be established in the Flathead only 1/3rd of the valley would be off limits to logging. The remaining 2/3rds would remain open to logging.

>
> • Wildsight does not believe in hunting as an effective tool to control
> healthy populations. Hunters and guide outfitters should be forever wary of
> trusting this group because they are more than happy to create a federal
> park and end forever the hunting that has occured in the Valley for over a
> century.

Responsible sportsmen recognize that core protected areas are required to sustain healthy populations for better hunting outside its boundaries. Currently there is less than 5 acres of wildlife sanctuaries in all of Southeastern BC. The closest being Waterton-Glacier National Park to the South and Kootenay and Glacier National Parks to the north.

British Columbia should do its part in contributing to the core protected area of Waterton-Glacier and fill in the missing piece. If this is not done the core protected area is incomplete. Just look at a map to see the big chunk missing out of it where BC protrudes into it.

>
> •Wildsight and their allies will continue to oppose any economic
> development in the Elk Valley, including any new pits proposed by Teck
> Coal. I predict a very rough ride for Teck in the next few years. Those who
> understand how the coal mines support our communities will need to step up
> our public support of mining in the Elk Valley.

Wildsight is not against mining. We recognize that mining is the backbone of the regional economy, providing important benefits to Elk Valley communities. Wildsight does, however, have concerns about the impacts that existing operations are having on water quality in the valley, and about the impacts new mines and coalbed methane developments will add to an already-stressed ecosystem.

Current environmental conditions need to be assessed comprehensively, at the landscape level. And cumulative effects of existing projects should be analyzed so that their true impacts can be evaluated—before any new mines or coalbed methane projects proceed.

>
> •Wildsight will bitterly oppose coal bed gas exploration by BP in the Elk
> Valley. Those who see this activity as a clean, safe industry and
> understand that our rules for cbg in BC are the strictest in North America,
> will need to be willing to say so publicly. Get the facts on cbg.

check out this review of BC’s so called world class CBM regulations. http://dogwoodinitiative.org/publicatio … h-columbia