I am truly apologetic for the double post …
"De-growth may work for those who make their living from government agencies, or outside sources. Those that make their living from the local economy must therefore be expendable. Actually our hospital, schools, city works, etc must necessarily shrink. Our population is at the cusp of imploding"
I wonder how you may refer to ‘our population’ and how you may know it will be ‘imploding’?
"Why do we have to grow or de-grow"
Finally, to answer this question that I somehow missed, I have to plead life. But perhaps I am interrupting grow with change, which may be a fallacy on my part.
