1.One of the greatest risks to wildlife is habitat loss and degradation. People that are criticizing RCR over the moose, but develope, trade, and sell real-estate are hypocrites. When you develop a new subdivision or build a new house (habitat) for one animal (us) you take habitat (forest) from other animals (moose) you are contributing to the greatest cause of animal destruction.
2.Guranteed 100% that the moose went straight to back country meats for butchering before being divided up into the food banks. The entire moose was used, not pushed over the bank like some would suggest.
3.RCR DOES NOT make any decisions, when it comes to wildlife. The conservation officer does a case study, weighs his options and decides what’s best for the animal. NOT what’s best for RCR’s guests, or whats best to get Ceadar Bowl open. If the animal acts "out of the ordinary" aggressive then the C.O. makes a decision. The C.O. has no interest in RCR. His only interest in the animals welfare and the publics safety. The moose was in complete destress most of the time.
