The IPCC has been infiltrated by horrible politics, bent on only one thing – transferring wealth. The real goal of Kyoto is to transfer money to third world countries in the form of imaginary CO2 credits.
The reality is the IPCC conclusions are constantly being challenged. When some IPCC scientists that have signed the document have asked to have their names removed, and some have quit the organization altogether one should start to some raise flags of one’s own. Especially when scientists left because they felt science was becoming political.
A recent article in the journal, Science, points how flawed the computer generated projections likely are, and more insidiously, how ad hoc they may be.
Real scientists ask questions, and are rarely willing to go on TV and make broad ranging statements. Scientists tend to be cautious and always re-evaluate the evidence.
William Gray:
Gray acknowledges that we’ve had some warming the past 30 years. “I don’t question that,” he explains. “And humans might have caused a very slight amount of this warming. Very slight. But this warming trend is not going to keep on going. My belief is that three, four years from now, the globe will start to cool again, as it did from the middle ’40s to the middle ’70s.”
I tend to believe these scientists over people with no credibility like David Suzuki or Al Gore.
